The Scenario
A creator uploads a video. After 1 hour it has 50 views. After 2 hours: 250 views. After 3 hours: 1250 views. After 4 hours: 6250 views. The creator plots the number of views against time — but the graph shoots up so steeply it is almost impossible to read. Then she tries plotting against instead. The points fall on a perfect straight line. Why does taking logs turn a wild curve into a tidy line — and how can she read off the growth rate from that line?
The Question
If describes the views, what equation do you get when you take natural logs of both sides? What does the gradient of the straight line tell you, and what does the intercept tell you?
Take natural logs of both sides: This is a linear equation in the form where , , gradient , intercept .
Plot against — if the data follows a power law, the points form a straight line. This is called a log-log plot.
Take natural logs of both sides: This is linear in : gradient , intercept .
Plot against — if the data follows an exponential law, the points form a straight line. This is called a semi-log plot.
Gradient and -intercept of the linearised plot directly give the parameters:
Power law: , (if using ) or (if using ).
Exponential: so ; .
Form groups of 3-4. You are detectives investigating a mystery dataset. The data follows a hidden law. Take logarithms, find the pattern, and crack the case! Work through 3 levels of increasing difficulty.
A mystery dataset has been recovered. Examine the values and identify the hidden law.
| x | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| y | 3 | 12 | 27 | 48 | 75 |
Look at how $y$ grows as $x$ increases. When $x$ doubles from 2 to 4, $y$ goes from 12 to 48 (×4). When $x$ triples from 1 to 3, $y$ goes from 3 to 27 (×9). This constant-ratio pattern in the $y$-values points to a power relationship $y = kx^n$.
| 0 | 0.69 | 1.10 | 1.39 | 1.61 | |
| 1.10 | 2.48 | 3.30 | 3.87 | 4.32 |
Gradient , intercept , so .
A new dataset has surfaced. This time the pattern is different. Investigate carefully.
| t | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P | 5 | 7.4 | 10.9 | 16.2 | 24.0 |
Compare the ratio of consecutive $P$-values: $\dfrac{7.4}{5} \approx 1.48$, $\dfrac{10.9}{7.4} \approx 1.47$, $\dfrac{16.2}{10.9} \approx 1.49$. Each step multiplies $P$ by almost the same factor — a signature of exponential growth $P = ka^{t}$ (or $P = ke^{ct}$).
. Gradient , intercept , so .
The graph of against is a straight line passing through the points and .
Recall $\ln y = \ln k + n \ln x$. The gradient of the line gives $n$, and the $y$-intercept gives $\ln k$. Gradient $n = \dfrac{3.4 - 1.6}{3 - 0} = 0.6$; the intercept is $1.6$, so $\ln k = 1.6$, meaning $k = e^{1.6} \approx 4.95$.
Gradient . Intercept , so .
All three levels cracked. You are a Linearisation Detective!
Final Score: 40 points
The variables and satisfy the equation , where and are constants.
(i) Show that the graph of against produces a straight line.
The graph of against passes through the points and .
(ii) Find the values of and .
Starting from , take (base 10) of both sides:
This is in the form where , gradient , intercept . So the graph of against is a straight line.
The line passes through and .
The -intercept (at ) is .
Gradient , so:
Intercept , so:
The variables and satisfy the equation , where and are constants. The graph of against is a straight line passing through the points and as shown in the diagram. Find the values of and , correct to 2 decimal places.
Starting from , take of both sides:
This is where , , gradient , intercept .
The line passes through and .
The -intercept (at ) is :
Draw a connection between each original equation (left) and its linearised form (right): click a left card, then click its matching right card. Use Reset to clear your connections and try again. When all 4 are connected, they are graded automatically — correct pairs turn green and wrong pairs turn red.
Perfect! All 4 pairs matched on the first try.
Test your understanding of all four lesson objectives. Each question targets one objective — try each before moving on!
The relationship is linearised by plotting against . What is the gradient of the resulting straight line?
. The gradient (coefficient of ) is .
For the model , what is the -intercept of the graph of against ?
. At , . So the intercept is .
A log-log plot of against has gradient and intercept . If , what are and ?
Gradient . Intercept , so .
Data is believed to follow . Which plot produces a straight line?
is linear in (not ). So plotting against (a semi-log plot) gives a straight line. A log-log plot ( vs ) is used for power laws .
The planet Saturn has many moons. The table below gives the mean radius of orbit and the time taken to complete one orbit for five of the best-known of them.
It is believed that the relationship between and is of the form .
(i) How can this be tested by plotting against ?
(ii) Make out a table of values of and and draw the graph.
(iii) Use your graph to estimate the values of and .
Take logs of :
This is linear in , so plotting against should give a straight line if the model holds. The gradient gives and the intercept gives .
Plot these points on graph paper; they should lie approximately on a straight line, as shown below:
Using two points on the line of best fit, e.g. and :
Intercept: , so (in units of km when is in days).
The table below shows the area, , occupied by a patch of mould at time days since measurements were started.
It is believed that may be modelled by a relationship of the form .
(i) Show that the model may be written as .
(ii) What graph must be plotted to test this model?
(iii) Plot the graph and use it to estimate the values of and .
(iv) (a) Estimate the time when the area of mould was . (b) Estimate the area of the mould after 3.5 days.
(v) How is this sort of growth pattern described?
For part (i), take of both sides of and use the laws of logs. For part (iii), plot against — the gradient is and the intercept is .
This is , a linear equation in .
Plot against (a semi-log plot). If the points lie on a straight line, the model is valid.
Log values: for .
Gradient , so and .
Intercept , so and .
(a) Set : days.
(b) At : .
This is exponential growth — the area increases by a constant ratio () each day.
The variables and satisfy the equation , where and are constants. The graph of against is a straight line passing through the points and as shown in the diagram. Find the values of and , correct to 2 decimal places.
Take of : . The gradient of the vs line is , and the intercept is .
Gradient , intercept .
At , :
The variables and satisfy the relation .
(i) By taking logarithms, show that the graph of against is a straight line. Find the exact value of the gradient of this line.
(ii) Calculate the coordinate of the point of intersection of this line with the line , giving your answer correct to 2 decimal places.
Take (or ) of both sides. Use to expand. The result will be — a linear equation in , so the graph of against is already a straight line (no need to take logs of again).
Take of both sides of :
This is in the form , so the graph of against is a straight line.
Set the two expressions for equal:
Using :
At : . Check and .
Exit Ticket
Check the learning objectives you feel confident about: